feminists are stupid
about 10 minutes ago, my dad sent me a link to an article with the headline “Women talk three times as much as men, says study.” as i skimmed through the article, i chuckled at the opening paragraphs;
It is something one half of the population has long suspected – and the other half always vocally denied. Women really do talk more than men.
In fact, women talk almost three times as much as men, with the average woman chalking up 20,000 words in a day – 13,000 more than the average man.
i actually laughed out loud at these bits:
Women also speak more quickly, devote more brainpower to chit-chat – and actually get a buzz out of hearing their own voices, a new book suggests.
And, if that wasn’t enough, the simple act of talking triggers a flood of brain chemicals which give women a rush similar to that felt by heroin addicts when they get a high.
good times, good times… who doesn’t enjoy a little gender rivalry? just as i was about to close the article, something caught my eye (emphasis added);
Dr Brizendine, a self-proclaimed feminist, says the differences can be traced back to the womb, where the sex hormone testosterone moulds the developing male brain.
wait, the person proliferating this fun little finding is a feminist? that doesn’t seem right… what’s going on here? a-ha!
The areas responsible for communication, emotion and memory are all pared back the unborn baby boy.
The result is that boys – and men – chat less than their female counterparts and struggle to express their emotions to the same extent.
“Women have an eight-lane superhighway for processing emotion, while men have a small country road,” said Dr Brizendine, who runs a female “mood and hormone” clinic in San Francisco.
i get it now, lure us in with a funny, email-friendly headline and then smack us in the face with your thinly veiled anti-male diatribe. Dr Feminazi continues;
There are, however, advantages to being the strong, silent type. Dr Brizendine explains that testosterone also reduces the size of the section of the brain involved in hearing – allowing men to become “deaf” to the most logical of arguments put forward by their wives and girlfriends.
But what the male brain may lack in converstation and emotion, they more than make up with in their ability to think about sex.
Dr Brizendine says the brain’s “sex processor” – the areas responsible for sexual thoughts – is twice as big as in men than in women, perhaps explaining why men are stereotyped as having sex on the mind.
wow. before we get to the part where i say what i think, let me remind you of what the important things are here are davehayes.org;
race cars, rock ‘n’ roll and things that go boom? check. keeping that in mind, let us continue.
now, i know that there has been a mass wussification of the men in this country as evidenced by the rise of the metrosexual, pervasion of increasingly feminine men in media (queer eye??) and a literal drop in testosterone levels of the male population. not to mention the demonization of father figures be it the bumbling idiot sitcom dad or the embarrassingly helpless husband in seemingly every advertisement we come across. daddy can’t cook, daddy can’t clean, daddy can’t discipline the child, daddy can’t control himself in best buy, daddy runs in circles holding a baby at arm’s length. possibly worst of all, daddy can’t express his feelings.
when the heck did it become wrong to be a man?
you know what, i’m going to say this. label my a misogynist, label me a chauvinist… i don’t care, it needs to be said to counteract the kind of insanity that’s becoming commonplace these days.
i submit that men, with their supposed backwoods brains unable to express emotions and crippled by a preoccupation with sex, are not the flawed gender. nay, women are the flawed gender. their inability to suppress emotions is what hinders their ability to engage in rational, cognitive thought and ultimately trivialized them in the workplace for so long. only now they’ve gayed the whole thing up enough that no one notices anymore. well, i notice. emotions are ultimately not useful when things need to get done. things need to be bought, sold, built and blown up. emotions, hissy fits, stomping, crying and whining do not get things done. men get things done. at least, they used to.
and where do you think your precious babies, the objects of your endless coo-cooing and coddling come from? the babies that you will pamper and protect and put in a no-score soccer league so they can grow up and be the spineless, non-competitive, limp-wristed, emasculated, emotional, fashionable and ultimately useless excuse for a man that you want me to be? that’s right, they come from us. without men and our stereotypical sex-crazed mindset, you wouldn’t have any children to ruin. left to yourselves and your underdeveloped (and frankly inadequate) sex drives, the human race would cease to exist in 2 generations, max. like i was saying, men get stuff done.
and how interesting, dr brizendine, that your research happens to substantiate the oldest complaint from a woman to a man that i can remember… you don’t listen to me! well you’re right, i don’t listen to you. maybe if you didn’t talk so much… seriously, through all your nagging and whining and feminist BS propaganda, all i hear is, “i’m useless in the real world!” you want to be taken seriously in the workplace? you want to be treated as an equal by your significant other? i have some advice for you: start acting the part. don’t cry when the police pull you over. don’t cry when you’re having a bad day at work. don’t cry when i tell you the honest-to-God truth when answering a question you asked me. don’t call your mom every time something doesn’t go your way. learn to work with people you don’t like, let little things go and punch someone in the nose when it needs to be done. don’t try to pull the playing field down to your level, rise to meet it. then maybe i’ll be able to take you seriously. until then, bugger off, i’ve got things to do.
February 22nd, 2007 at 10:44 am
I cant agree with you more. Especially in a society where men have to be the ones to make the sacrifices and nothing is expected from the women. Everything is handed to women on silber platters and it sickens me. This wont help the feminists cause. Like you said, It just lowers the playing field making men work harder and inevitably rising above it all.
March 31st, 2008 at 4:24 pm
Hey, I’m a gal, and I agree with what you say. No problems here. At the ripe old age of 39, I’ve NEVER called myself a feminist(or a Liberal…) or lots of other nasty a** things that so many women are disturbed by that I DON’T call myself. I think you’re funny, and I like your website.
Thanks
Pilar, Massachusetts
June 9th, 2008 at 4:00 pm
Great post, I’ve seen this downward spiral for a long time now, growing up in a female dominated house, they loved the daytime propagan- er shows..and i got the full extent of my mother’s and sister’s wrath..It felt like i was the uncle who sexually molested a girl on a pourly budgeted lifetime movie, or that I was the father who beat his wife and kids on oprah, and I was just a f**ing kid! my dad of course didnt know what a man was so i learned nothing from him, after years of depression and near suicides(and bad relationships with women) I learned how truly messed up women have become as well as myself and other men due to this unbalance.
In the end you see how truly weak humans can be, and that other’s will prey upon other people’s fear’s and anger’s, its nothing new to history, just a different flavor now.
August 20th, 2008 at 9:59 am
Hey man, you have some really good points. Where I work, the women treat men like crap, but still act like they are the “victims”. ??? How can we complain that men do not treat us as equals when we belittle them? Our differences should be seen as the differences of two puzzle pieces — the things that bring us together, the things that make us who we are.
April 7th, 2009 at 11:51 pm
What wrong with the classical image of woman anyways?
Nothing at all actually
Especially now when you can opt out of marriage.
I mean if you have a passion, by all means, follow it.
You don’t have to throw harsh words at men , cause we restrain ourselves from stooping to your level.
woops forget the last clause XD
May 28th, 2009 at 12:48 pm
Feminists are stupid and ignorant. Thank them for voting in Clinton and Obama. No apology is necessary. Feminists are stupid and ignorant? Does anyone need it stated in ebonics? Dem fukin’ feminist biotches are fuckin’ dumb! End of translation.
The only good a feminist can bring is… hell, I can’t think of anything.
And no, to the weak people out there, I have no problem with the ladies. I have a wife and eight children, six of them girls, three of which are married off. Obviously, your assumption that masculine and commanding men are sick, is just a fad that will pass with time.
May 29th, 2009 at 11:52 am
Females are taking control of the society now.
Feminist do not really gain fairness, but “unfairness towards male”.
For tens of centuries women have been suppressed, but have they rebelled?
Citizens can be suppressed, but most of the time they rebel and take over the government.
When it is women VS man, this does not happen because women are emotional rather than rational. The result is they don’t have philosophers and revolutionaries.
If people don’t do anything to stop the growing “feminism virus”, the society will be destroyed, because “what is being valued” will be altered.
This means, in the past, being a gentleman and smart is what is considered good.
After feminism take control, this will change to be, being irrational and emotional, often crying is good.
August 11th, 2009 at 8:24 pm
i agree with a few of your points exept boys dont have emotions that’s BS! and i swear they complain more then women! im no victim i know how to get stuff done but seems as thought all these metro’s are becoming more popular because they’re trying to be more feminin because women are the superior race (: so screw you a** hole were human we can cry if its needed mayb if you had to bleed every month and put up with the discomfert and pain of being a woman mayb u’d get a bit emotional too infact i dont think men could handle it.
August 23rd, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Men and Women always get more stuff accomplished together in love, cooperation and purpose than separately and divided in hate.
September 2nd, 2009 at 12:52 pm
You know, I could make this longwinded argument, lisa, but it all comes down to this. Women are not a race, you astoundingly moronic woman. Additionally, you should distinguish bewteen personality and gender traits, and overall intelligence and superiorty.
September 26th, 2009 at 6:26 pm
you’re my hero
I had to go ahead and say it
December 1st, 2009 at 8:18 pm
Women work best in the kitchen, bent over.
I kid. Women = immanent.
Men = transcendent.
Immanence is being tied to the body. Hence, the trembling and heaving bosoms and hysterics. Immanence will only bring you more of the same. Life propagating life. They raise the kids in the house, giving us more kids.
Transcendence is going beyond the body. Using reason, rationality, or violence, and the ability to take risks and break the rules. Inventions, conquering new territory and new places of thought, rising above the mere replication of life that immanence brings.
When you worship one gender and disparage the other — or even draw distinction between the genders — you are paying tribute, in essence, to this dichotomy.
So why are men tied to transcendence? Why women to immanence?
Moreover, is the association necessary? Is it DESTINY, or HISTORY?
We can’t deny that we treat women like shit. We dominate the fuck out of them, and have for centuries. Slight differences in biology aggravated and appropriated through history into and entire gender’s destiny.
We have to change the trend. Much as I hate to admit it, “D” is right. More can be accomplished with both members of our race recognizing transcendent and immanent qualities in eachother.
December 17th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
I agree.It’s hit the media.The man is the snob,the boy is the problem child,the girl is Miss Petite Sweet and the woman does all the work.
December 17th, 2009 at 8:12 pm
What has happened to society?The proper definition of “equality” seems to be “discrimination after a fake revolution from it”